• Home
  • Resources
    • Find Resources by Topic Tags
    • Cybersecurity Policy Chart
    • CSIAC Reports
    • Webinars
    • Podcasts
    • Cybersecurity Digest
    • Standards & Reference Docs
    • Journals
    • Certifications
    • Acronym DB
    • Cybersecurity Related Websites
  • Services
    • Free Technical Inquiry
    • Core Analysis Task (CAT) Program
    • Subject Matter Expert (SME) Network
    • Training
    • Contact Us
  • Community
    • Upcoming Events
    • Cybersecurity
    • Modeling & Simulation
    • Knowledge Management
    • Software Engineering
  • About
    • About the CSIAC
    • The CSIAC Team
    • Subject Matter Expert (SME) Support
    • DTIC’s IAC Program
    • DTIC’s R&E Gateway
    • DTIC STI Program
    • FAQs
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Login / Register

CSIAC

Cyber Security and Information Systems Information Analysis Center

  • Resources
    • Find Resources by Topic Tags
    • Cybersecurity Policy Chart
    • CSIAC Reports
    • Webinars
    • Podcasts
    • Cybersecurity Digest
    • Standards & Reference Docs
    • Journals
    • Certifications
    • Acronym DB
    • Cybersecurity Websites
  • Services
    • Free Technical Inquiry
    • Core Analysis Task (CAT) Program
    • Subject Matter Expert (SME) Network
    • Training
    • Contact
  • Community
    • Upcoming Events
    • Cybersecurity
    • Modeling & Simulation
    • Knowledge Management
    • Software Engineering
  • About
    • About the CSIAC
    • The CSIAC Team
    • Subject Matter Expert (SME) Support
    • DTIC’s IAC Program
    • DTIC’s R&E Gateway
    • DTIC STI Program
    • FAQs
  • Cybersecurity
  • Modeling & Simulation
  • Knowledge Management
  • Software Engineering
/ Journal Issues / Cost Estimation & Systems Acquisition / Parametric Modeling to Support System Acquisition

Parametric Modeling to Support System Acquisition

Published in Software Tech News
Volume: 15 Number: 1 - Cost Estimation & Systems Acquisition

Author: William Roetzheim
Posted: 03/14/2016 | Leave a Comment

Requirements Change

The second source of change is actual requirement changes.  Here I’m talking about actual changes in the underlying requirements.  Perhaps there is a building code change that must be met.  Perhaps the legislature has changed a law which affects how the software should operate.  Perhaps the operational feedback from the field requires modifications in the armor plating.  The longer a project lasts, the more you can count on the requirements changing during the project.  For software projects, the rate of requirement change varies from 3% to 15% per year, with 12% being a common number.  The good news is that these changes are clear candidates for scope management through the change control process.  The bad news is that because they are changes to a project that is already underway, in most cases the only person who can implement the change is the company already doing the work.  This sets up a sole source bidder situation that is uncomfortable for the customer in the best case, and that can be used by the vendor to generate large profits at government expense in the worst case.

  image3_2

Figure 3:  Typical Change Request Processing

Let’s take a DoD project as an example.  The approach to managing change requests might look something like Figure 3.  A change request is prepared; an impact assessment plan (IAP) or some similar document is prepared; the vendor estimates costs; the government reviews the estimate.  If the costs are approved, the government then attempts to justify the additional funding and authorize the change.  If they do not agree with the estimate, or they cannot justify the expenditure, then they negotiate with the vendor.  At this point, there is often a significant amount of stress and finger pointing, with no-one very happy.

image4_2

Figure 4: IGCE Oversight Estimate

The first attempt to fix the problem often looks like Figure 4.  Here, the government creates an independent government cost estimate (IGCE) for validation of the vendor estimate.  As long as the IGCE estimate matches the vendor estimates, this approach works swimmingly.  Unfortunately, when they don’t match, I have yet to meet a vendor that didn’t think their estimate was right and the IGCE estimate was wrong.  Again, lots of friction and finger pointing.  This time, because of the clear discrepancy between the two estimates, the almost inevitable result is that the entire process gets deadlocked.

image5_1

Figure 5: Model Based Oversight

Now, let’s look at an alternative that does work consistently, on projects of all sizes and complexities (Figure 5).  The first step is that a parametric model based approach to estimation is agreed to by all stakeholders, configured, and validated.  This might be a software cost estimating model, a construction cost estimating database, or any other standard estimating method that is objective and verifiable.  This approach, and the underlying configuration, should be set up and agreed to with no money on the table, thereby allowing stakeholders to be objective.  Once it is finalized, then as an IAP is completed both the Vendor and an independent government expert review the IAP and use the common, agreed to estimating model to create independent estimates.  If they match, then the estimate is approved and the change control board can proceed with a cost benefit review of the change request.  If they do not match, then there is a reconciliation meeting to identify where and why the underlying assumptions do not match.  The key here is that the discussion is focused on technical aspects of the work to be done (e.g., HLO object definitiions), not on costs or efforts.  Once that is clarified, then both parties run the models again and compare results.  In my experience, 70% of the IAPs result in estimates that match and therefore do not need a reconciliation meeting at all; another 24% are resolved following one reconciliation meeting, and 6% either require another meeting or require that the original change request be clarified as to intent7.

Pages: Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7

Previous Article:
« History is the Key to Estimation Success
Next Article:
Outcome-Based Acquisition »

Author

William Roetzheim
William Roetzheim
Mr. Roetzheim (PMP, RMP, MBA, CRISC, CISA, IFPUG) is founder and CEO of Level 4 Ventures, Inc., an SDVOSB that offers independent cost analysis, risk management, and project oversight services for large IT projects. He has written 27 published books, over 100 articles, and three columns. He is a frequent lecturer and instructor at multiple technology conferences and two California universities. He can be reached at William@level4ventures.com.

Reader Interactions

Leave a Comment Cancel

You must be logged in to post a comment.

sidebar

Blog Sidebar

Featured Content

Data Privacy Day - Jan 28

Data Privacy Day is January 28th

You can help create a global community that respects privacy, safeguards data, and enables trust. You can help teach others about privacy at home, at work, and in your community.

Learn How

Featured Subject Matter Expert (SME): Daksha Bhasker

A dynamic CSIAC SME, Senior Principal Cybersecurity Architect, Daksha Bhasker has 20 years of experience in the telecommunications services provider industry. She has worked in systems security design and architecture in production environments of carriers, often leading multidisciplinary teams for cybersecurity integration, from conception to delivery of complex technical solutions. As a CSIAC SME, Daksha's contributions include several published CSIAC Journal articles and a webinar presentation on the sophiscated architectures that phone carriers use to stop robocalls.

View SME's Contributed Content

The DoD Cybersecurity Policy Chart

The DoD Cybersecurity Policy Chart

This chart captures the tremendous breadth of applicable policies, some of which many cybersecurity professionals may not even be aware, in a helpful organizational scheme.

View the Policy Chart

CSIAC Report - Smart Cities, Smart Bases and Secure Cloud Architecture for Resiliency by Design

Integration of Smart City Technologies to create Smart Bases for DoD will require due diligence with respect to the security of the data produced by Internet of Things (IOT) and Industrial Internet of Things (IIOT). This will increase more so with the rollout of 5G and increased automation "at the edge". Commercially, data will be moving to the cloud first, and then stored for process improvement analysis by end-users. As such, implementation of Secure Cloud Architectures is a must. This report provides some use cases and a description of a risk based approach to cloud data security. Clear understanding, adaptation, and implementation of a secure cloud framework will provide the military the means to make progress in becoming a smart military.

Read the Report

CSIAC Journal - Data-Centric Environment: Rise of Internet-Based Modern Warfare “iWar”

CSIAC Journal Cover Volume 7 Number 4

This journal addresses a collection of modern security concerns that range from social media attacks and internet-connected devices to a hypothetical defense strategy for private sector entities.

Read the Journal

CSIAC Journal M&S Special Edition - M&S Applied Across Broad Spectrum Defense and Federal Endeavors

CSIAC Journal Cover Volume 7 Number 3

This Special Edition of the CSIAC Journal highlights a broad array of modeling and simulation contributions – whether in training, testing, experimentation, research, engineering, or other endeavors.

Read the Journal

CSIAC Journal - Resilient Industrial Control Systems (ICS) & Cyber Physical Systems (CPS)

CSIAC Journal Cover Volume 7 Number 2

This edition of the CSIAC Journal focuses on the topic of cybersecurity of Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS), particularly those that make up Critical Infrastructure (CI).

Read the Journal

Recent Video Podcasts

  • Agile Condor: Supercomputing at the Edge for Intelligent Analytics Series: CSIAC Webinars
  • Securing the Supply Chain: A Hybrid Approach to Effective SCRM Policies and Procedures Series: The CSIAC Podcast
  • DoD Vulnerability Disclosure Program (VDP) Series: CSIAC Webinars
  • 5 Best Practices for a Secure Infrastructure Series: The CSIAC Podcast
  • Fifth Generation Cellular – A Discussion with Idaho National Laboratory on 5G – Part 4 Series: Fifth Generation Cellular
View all Podcasts

Upcoming Events

Mon 18

SANS Stay Sharp: Blue Team Operations 2021

January 18 - January 20
Organizer: SANS Institute
Mon 18

SANS Cyber Security Central: Jan 2021

January 18 - January 23
Organizer: SANS Institute
Tue 19

AI Champions, Online – Supply Chain

January 19 @ 14:00 - January 21 @ 15:30 EST
Thu 21

SANS Cyber Threat Intelligence Summit 2021

January 21 - January 22
Organizer: SANS Institute
Fri 22

SANS Cyber Threat Intelligence Solutions Track 2021

January 22 @ 09:00 - 17:00 EST
Organizer: SANS Institute
View all Events

Footer

CSIAC Products & Services

  • Free Technical Inquiry
  • Core Analysis Tasks (CATs)
  • Resources
  • Events Calendar
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Product Feedback Form

About CSIAC

The CSIAC is a DoD-sponsored Center of Excellence in the fields of Cybersecurity, Software Engineering, Modeling & Simulation, and Knowledge Management & Information Sharing.Learn More

Contact Us

Phone:800-214-7921
Email:info@csiac.org
Address:   266 Genesee St.
Utica, NY 13502
Send us a Message
US Department of Defense Logo USD(R&E) Logo DTIC Logo DoD IACs Logo

Copyright 2012-2021, Quanterion Solutions Incorporated

Sitemap | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Accessibility Information
Accessibility / Section 508 | FOIA | Link Disclaimer | No Fear Act | Policy Memoranda | Privacy, Security & Copyright | Recovery Act | USA.Gov

This website uses cookies to provide our services and to improve your experience. By using this site, you consent to the use of our cookies. To read more about the use of our site, please click "Read More". Otherwise, click "Dismiss" to hide this notice. Dismiss Read More
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled

Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.

Non-necessary

Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.